Skip to content
Lincolnshire Counts — Lincolnshire, in numbers.Local help →
Lincolnshire Counts / Council areas / North Kesteven / Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford

Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford · North Kesteven

Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford: your neighbourhood

Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford electoral ward · May 2026 boundaries. Every figure carries its own date.

What stands out here?

Homes rented privately: 23% here, compared with 16% across North Kesteven (7 percentage points higher).

A larger private-rented sector changes the mix of housing advice, enforcement and tenant support needed. It does not tell us whether individual homes are affordable or safe.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

People aged 16+ with no qualifications: 12.6% here, compared with 16.2% across North Kesteven (3.6 percentage points lower).

Formal qualifications are only one part of someone's skills. Training decisions also need current vacancies, employment and residents' experience.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent: 33.4% here, compared with 29.9% across North Kesteven (3.6 percentage points higher).

Qualifications show local skills, not whether people have secure jobs or use those skills at work.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

The ward in numbers

People aged 65 or over

23.1%

21 March 2021 · Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

All usual residents

1,283 out of 5,557.

Source and method →

People reporting bad or very bad health

4.9%

21 March 2021 · Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

All usual residents; self-reported, not age-standardised

273 out of 5,548.

Source and method →

People counted in the census

5,555

21 March 2021 · Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

All usual residents

5,555 out of 5,555.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent

33.4%

21 March 2021 · Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

Residents aged 16 and over

1,587 out of 4,745.

Source and method →

Households facing at least one measured disadvantage

46.9%

21 March 2021 · Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

All households

1,071 out of 2,284.

Source and method →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages

13.4%

21 March 2021 · Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

All households

307 out of 2,284.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ outside the labour market

38.6%

21 March 2021 · Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

1,829 out of 4,737.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ in work

59.6%

21 March 2021 · Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

2,823 out of 4,737.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ not working because of long-term illness or disability

2.6%

21 March 2021 · Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

123 out of 4,737.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with no qualifications

12.6%

21 March 2021 · Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

Residents aged 16 and over

596 out of 4,745.

Source and method →

Homes rented privately

23%

21 March 2021 · Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

All households

526 out of 2,290.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ retired

27.5%

21 March 2021 · Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

1,303 out of 4,737.

Source and method →

Homes rented from a council or housing association

9%

21 March 2021 · Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

All households

198 out of 2,290.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ unemployed

1.8%

21 March 2021 · Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly. Unemployed residents as a share of all residents aged 16+; this is not the unemployment rate among economically active people.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

85 out of 4,737.

Source and method →

Crime and safety

Police-recorded locations for Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford ward. Locations are approximate; these are not all crimes or a measure of personal risk.

133 mapped crimes

September 2025 to August 2026. Compared with 126 in the previous 12 months. Anti-social behaviour is counted separately.

Mapped crime over time

September 2024 to August 2026

Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford ward · mapped crimes

Reviewed figures: September 2024 to August 2026. This reviewed record covers fewer than 30 years, so the chart opens on all of it.

Shown on this chart: 8 mapped crimes in September 2024; 9 mapped crimes in August 2026. These are recorded counts; check the coverage notes before comparing periods.

The line joins consecutive published observations.

Monthly crime and anti-social behaviour
Recorded locations by month · Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford
MonthMapped crimeAnti-social behaviour
September 202483
October 202432
November 2024134
December 2024144
January 2025175
February 202562
March 2025155
April 202543
May 2025101
June 2025113
July 2025142
August 2025114
September 2025123
October 2025194
November 202593
December 2025154
January 2026124
February 202663
March 202658
April 202694
May 202671
June 2026114
July 2026190
August 202692
Crime categories in the latest complete year
September 2025 to August 2026 · Cranwell, Leasingham & Wilsford
CategoryMapped crimes
violent crime78
criminal damage arson12
burglary10
other theft10
public order8
vehicle crime6
other crime5
drugs3
shoplifting1
What these numbers include

Approximate published locations, not every crime or personal risk.

Anti-social behaviour is separate. Transport police and unusable locations excluded.

An empty ward count means no mapped rows in the complete required force files; it does not prove that no crime occurred.

These are retrieved mapped records, not a guarantee of complete crime reporting. Approximate locations and unmapped incidents limit comparisons.

Publication history: Lincolnshire Police: Crime data not provided for May 2026. The force will provide a data refresh as soon as possible. Later update: Lincolnshire Police: Crime data refresh for May 2026.

Missing ward-months invalidate totals and changes. Busy centres attract visitors, so residential population is not a measure of the number of people exposed.

Police data and method →

What could improve local safety →

Projects and proposed responses

A nearby project is not proof of a benefit to the whole ward. Only source-supported ward links are attached here.

No project boundary has been verified against this ward. See projects and their stated locations →

Proposed responses across North Kesteven →