Skip to content
Lincolnshire Counts — Lincolnshire, in numbers.Local help →
Lincolnshire Counts / Council areas / North Kesteven / Navenby & Brant Broughton

Navenby & Brant Broughton · North Kesteven

Navenby & Brant Broughton: your neighbourhood

Navenby & Brant Broughton electoral ward · May 2026 boundaries. Every figure carries its own date.

What stands out here?

People aged 65 or over: 30.2% here, compared with 23.4% across North Kesteven (6.8 percentage points higher).

Age helps locate demand for accessible homes, transport and support. Being older does not itself mean someone needs care.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent: 35.9% here, compared with 29.9% across North Kesteven (6 percentage points higher).

Qualifications show local skills, not whether people have secure jobs or use those skills at work.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

Homes rented privately: 11% here, compared with 16% across North Kesteven (4.7 percentage points lower).

A larger private-rented sector changes the mix of housing advice, enforcement and tenant support needed. It does not tell us whether individual homes are affordable or safe.

21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.

Why this comparison is valid

The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.

Source →
A proposed response →

The ward in numbers

People aged 65 or over

30.2%

21 March 2021 · Navenby & Brant Broughton

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

All usual residents

1,710 out of 5,661.

Source and method →

People reporting bad or very bad health

4.3%

21 March 2021 · Navenby & Brant Broughton

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

All usual residents; self-reported, not age-standardised

242 out of 5,669.

Source and method →

People counted in the census

5,675

21 March 2021 · Navenby & Brant Broughton

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

All usual residents

5,675 out of 5,675.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent

35.9%

21 March 2021 · Navenby & Brant Broughton

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

Residents aged 16 and over

1,736 out of 4,841.

Source and method →

Households facing at least one measured disadvantage

46.1%

21 March 2021 · Navenby & Brant Broughton

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

All households

1,149 out of 2,492.

Source and method →

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages

12.3%

21 March 2021 · Navenby & Brant Broughton

The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

All households

306 out of 2,492.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ outside the labour market

46%

21 March 2021 · Navenby & Brant Broughton

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

2,224 out of 4,837.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ in work

52.6%

21 March 2021 · Navenby & Brant Broughton

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

2,542 out of 4,837.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ not working because of long-term illness or disability

2.9%

21 March 2021 · Navenby & Brant Broughton

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

140 out of 4,837.

Source and method →

People aged 16+ with no qualifications

16.4%

21 March 2021 · Navenby & Brant Broughton

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

Residents aged 16 and over

792 out of 4,841.

Source and method →

Homes rented privately

11%

21 March 2021 · Navenby & Brant Broughton

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

All households

281 out of 2,482.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ retired

34.9%

21 March 2021 · Navenby & Brant Broughton

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

1,689 out of 4,837.

Source and method →

Homes rented from a council or housing association

10%

21 March 2021 · Navenby & Brant Broughton

Show the workings

Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup

All households

260 out of 2,482.

Source and method →

Residents aged 16+ unemployed

1.5%

21 March 2021 · Navenby & Brant Broughton

Show the workings

21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly. Unemployed residents as a share of all residents aged 16+; this is not the unemployment rate among economically active people.

All usual residents aged 16 and over

71 out of 4,837.

Source and method →

Crime and safety

Police-recorded locations for Navenby & Brant Broughton ward. Locations are approximate; these are not all crimes or a measure of personal risk.

143 mapped crimes

September 2025 to August 2026. Compared with 152 in the previous 12 months. Anti-social behaviour is counted separately.

Mapped crime over time

September 2024 to August 2026

Navenby & Brant Broughton ward · mapped crimes

Reviewed figures: September 2024 to August 2026. This reviewed record covers fewer than 30 years, so the chart opens on all of it.

Shown on this chart: 24 mapped crimes in September 2024; 13 mapped crimes in August 2026. These are recorded counts; check the coverage notes before comparing periods.

The line joins consecutive published observations.

Monthly crime and anti-social behaviour
Recorded locations by month · Navenby & Brant Broughton
MonthMapped crimeAnti-social behaviour
September 2024241
October 202482
November 2024143
December 2024113
January 2025130
February 2025162
March 2025102
April 2025145
May 2025105
June 2025103
July 2025124
August 2025107
September 202586
October 2025122
November 202555
December 2025182
January 2026135
February 202691
March 2026156
April 2026131
May 202697
June 2026145
July 2026144
August 2026136
Crime categories in the latest complete year
September 2025 to August 2026 · Navenby & Brant Broughton
CategoryMapped crimes
violent crime77
other theft16
burglary15
criminal damage arson14
vehicle crime8
public order4
other crime3
shoplifting3
robbery2
possession of weapons1
What these numbers include

Approximate published locations, not every crime or personal risk.

Anti-social behaviour is separate. Transport police and unusable locations excluded.

An empty ward count means no mapped rows in the complete required force files; it does not prove that no crime occurred.

These are retrieved mapped records, not a guarantee of complete crime reporting. Approximate locations and unmapped incidents limit comparisons.

Publication history: Lincolnshire Police: Crime data not provided for May 2026. The force will provide a data refresh as soon as possible. Later update: Lincolnshire Police: Crime data refresh for May 2026.

Missing ward-months invalidate totals and changes. Busy centres attract visitors, so residential population is not a measure of the number of people exposed.

Police data and method →

What could improve local safety →

Projects and proposed responses

A nearby project is not proof of a benefit to the whole ward. Only source-supported ward links are attached here.

No project boundary has been verified against this ward. See projects and their stated locations →

Proposed responses across North Kesteven →